dusty wrote:Getting back to the original rant, I just had to post this link. She says what she feels much better than could I.
[ATTACH]19950[/ATTACH]
Yes Dusty, She has a larger vocabulary!:D
And apparently is not afraid to use it!
Moderators: HopefulSSer, admin
dusty wrote:Getting back to the original rant, I just had to post this link. She says what she feels much better than could I.
[ATTACH]19950[/ATTACH]
There is a bond. Many veterans are also seniors and many seniors are veterans.pennview wrote:Well Patty hit the nail on the head regarding the Ponzi scheme aspect of Social Security. Obama yesterday said Social Security payments and Veterans benefits would be delayed if "Republicans" don't raise the debt limit, proving that those "assets" held by the Social Security Administration are just so much hooie, or B.S. in Pattyesque terms. If they were true "assets," the Social Security Administration would simply cash them in and pay the benefits on time. Since the executive branch runs Social Security, Obama gets to say who gets what and when. It's quite enlightening to know that Seniors and Veterans aren't on the top of Obama's get paid list. Maybe Seniors and Veterans should form unions.
Yep, there never was a "trust fund". There has always been, instead, simply a "scam".pennview wrote:Every last penny of Social Security surplus funds ... have been spent on whatever the federal government spends money on. The surplus funds went into the U.S. general fund and got spent.
...unfortunately it's the taxpayers who are on the hook for supplying the money that makes these assets, assets.